Tag: RAPTURE

RAPTURE: UNSPOKEN WORDS, AND THE END OF THE CHURCH AGE

At the outset I need to make one thing very clear, and should have done so at the start of my series: I am not an amillenialist…

Teachings_of_Jesus_40_of_40__the_rapture__one_in_the_bed__Jan_Luyken_etching__Bowyer_Bible

WHAT PAUL AND JESUS DID NOT SAY

Sometimes facts can be clear or implied by what isn’t said, and I believe that’s the case with the rapture. Yes, Paul called the rapture a “mystery” (1 Corinthians 15:21), and his designation is used today to bolster the idea that Jesus will come like a thief in the night for his Church (see the previous part of my series).  But Paul wasn’t secretive about what he knew about the rapture: he went on to describe it (verses 51-55). 

Paul warned the Thessalonians not to be easily led into the notion that the ‘day of the Lord’ had already arrived. Evidently some such deception was going around at that time. According to Peter, the “day of the Lord” includes the destruction of this present earth (2 Peter 3:10-13), and according to Paul it will include sudden destruction falling on an ungodly world of people (1 Thessalonians 5:1-4). So the ‘day of the Lord’ includes the Tribulation and following events. Paul told the Thessalonians what to look out for as signs that the day of the Lord had really begun. He said:

“Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition” (2 Thessalonians 2:3 KJV).

Please notice what Paul did not say. He didn’t say anything like this:

 “That day will not come before we’re all taken into heaven, so don’t worry about it”.

This to me is very telling. It seems like a serious omission, if he really knew and was preaching, as some claim, that there was a rapture coming before Antichrist is revealed. The first sign, said Paul, was a falling away and the man of perdition: not rapture. This fact is compounded when we see that Jesus identified the very same event, which he called ‘the abomination of desolation’, as a clear sign that the Tribulation was about to begin. It has to be significant that Jesus said nothing about any rapture coming before the “abomination” (Matthew 24:15-22). He wrote about the rapture in Matthew chapter 24: why didn’t he say that it would occur first as a deliverance from what was to come? Instead, he said “..but he who stands firm to the end will be saved” (verse 14). The first clear event, according to Jesus, was the abomination.  He also spoke to his disciples as though they would see that sign.

WHEN WILL THE END OF THE CHURCH AGE BE?

The beginning of Daniel’s seven-year period has been assigned by “prophecy experts” as the end of the Church age, since it marks the continuation of God’s dealings with Israel. They presume that it is therefore the end of God’s dealings with the Church on the earth, and as such, the Church is no longer required to be on the earth. But are there any clearer indicators of the end of the Church age?

THE FULNESS OF THE GENTILES

Paul said that “Israel has experienced a hardening in part until the full number of Gentiles has come in” (Romans 11:25). So a very pertinent question here would be, “when does the hardening of Israel end, according to Bible prophecy?”. This will mark the end of the ‘full number of Gentiles’ being saved. And this in turn would, surely, mark the end of the “Church Age”.

If we look into some of the Old Testament Prophecies, we find that the Jews will come to realize who their Messiah is when he appears physically over Jerusalem, at the end of the Tribulation (Zechariah chapter 12, especially verse 10). Even then, considering that salvation will still be by faith in Jesus, is it right to see an end of the Church Age at any other time than his visible return to the earth? The gospel will still be preached during the Tribulation (Revelation 14:6), so how can we arbitrarily put an end to the Church age before it?

DO THE 24 ELDERS REPRESENT THE ALREADY RAPTURED CHURCH?

Some Pre-Trib. teachers refer to the twenty four elders who John sees on thrones, initially observed in Revelation chapters 4 and 5, situated around the throne of God. The elders sing of redemption (5:9-10), and the NIV translates certain words in their song to ‘they’ and ‘them’, suggesting the elders are referring to the redemption of others who are still on the earth. Pre-Trib. teachers say that the words should be translated ‘we’ and ‘us’, as they are in the KJV. In other words, the redemption the elders are singing of is their own, and they are actually representatives of the Church, and possibly Old Testament saints also. This, say the experts, signifies that the Church will be in heaven before the Tribulation.

I don’t know enough about Greek to comment on whether these words should be translated to refer to the elders around the throne, or to humans still on the earth. I can only make a couple of observations here. One is that when John is taken on his trip to heaven, which Pre-Tribulationists say is a type of the rapture, the elders are already there and settled in: they didn’t arrive with John in his ‘rapture’ (chapter 4 verses 4, and 9-11). Instead they already know everything about what’s going on and proceed to tell John (5:5; 7:13-21). This seems strange since John was an original member of the Church. More that that, since John was the disciple who was especially close to Jesus, it seems odd that if at least twelve of the elders in heaven are representatives of the Church, he wasn’t even invited to “take his place” with them. Also, there are still followers of Jesus on the earth, as I have already pointed out. Are these believers, who “hold to the testimony of Jesus Christ”, and who willingly give their lives for him, not to be represented in heaven?

 

MIND-BURP 10: BEWARE OF THE EXPERTS!

 

th

HAS THE MOON TURNED TO BLOOD?

(Eurodollar: “My Final Thought”)

There’s been plenty of talk in some Christian circles over the most recent lunar eclipses, particularly among Pentecostals. The claim is that the latest “Blood Moons” not only coincide with Jewish feasts-a rare occurrence-but are also likely to be, as they have been in times past, harbingers of important events affecting the Jewish nation. Therefore, the reasoning goes, this is that which is spoken of in Bible prophecy:

“The sun will be turned to darkness and the moon to blood before the coming of the great and dreadful day of the Lord” (Joel 2: 31).

Well, so far, the sun hasn’t “turned to darkness”, a necessary accompaniment to the Biblical “Blood Moon.”

The book of Revelation describes the moon turning red (Revelation 6:12-14). It occurs upon the opening of the sixth seal, when the earth will really be “in the thick of it”: world-wide war, earthquakes, famine, plagues, persecution of believers, and the sky itself rolling up, and “every mountain and island” being removed from its place. The blood moons we’ve witnessed so far surely pale (excuse the pun) in significance to the apocalyptic events which will produce the real blood red moon.

Anyone who’s looked at my blog before will know that I believe the times spoken of in Bible prophecy regarding the return of Jesus Christ are approaching, and I’m more and more convinced as I see the ongoing trend of events in the Middle-East. Most significantly, the nations of the world reject Israel’s determination to retain its ancient capital and to defend itself against perpetual aggression.

However, I’m very skeptical about “cut and paste” fulfillments which probably aren’t fulfillments at all, but are more likely normal, naturally occurring phenomena. In my more cynical moments, I can’t help wondering if they aren’t opportunities for more book royalties, DVD sales, and TV specials.

11043126-dramatic-background--dark-sky-bright-light

EXPERTIUS WRONGIMANUS AND THE BIG BANG

There’s a certain disease which has reached pandemic proportions, and I’m not talking about the one being imported to the West from Africa (why is the President not stopping flights from the affected nations?). I mean the one which affects “experts” negatively, so that they get the most simple facts mixed up or just plain wrong. How often, over the years, I ‘ve heard of new “conclusive” evidence for evolution being discovered, and then quietly retracted later.

In March, the world’s news media reported that “smoking gun” evidence for the Big Bang had finally been found (again). The BBC’s “Today” program reported that the US BICEP team said it had found a pattern on the sky left by the rapid expansion of space just fractions of a second after the Big Bang.

Professor Steven Hawking remarked that the finding was “another confirmation of inflation”, the idea that the Universe experienced an exponential growth spurt in its first fraction of a second.

However, in June the Institute for Creation Research, in an article titled “‘Smoking Gun’ Proof of Big Bang Already In Doubt” written by Jake Hebert, Ph.D., reported that “only two months after this ‘discovery’ a number of secular scientists have become increasingly skeptical” http://www.icr.org/article/8177/

The Beeb has just reluctantly admitted “…new data has found that the group may have underestimated the confounding effects of dust in our own galaxy”.

http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-29326918

In September,  in an article called “Another Big Bang Blunder”,  ICR, commenting on the over-exuberant March pronouncement,  reported:

“One prominent theoretical physicist even called it a “Big Bang blunder” and noted that the BICEP2 researchers made their dramatic announcement to the world before their paper had even been peer-reviewed by qualified scientists. This was a serious breach of scientific ethics and protocol. Worse yet, researchers from King’s College London are now claiming that accepting the BICEP2 results as legitimate would imply that the universe should have collapsed back in on itself shortly after the Big Bang, so that our universe should not even exist!” (see the article for references): http://www.icr.org/i/pdf/af/af1409.pdf

Dr_Martens,_black,_old

EXPERTIUS WRONGIMANUS AND THE RAPTURE

This very day I heard a famous preacher on the radio, answering a question on whether or not the Church would go through the Tribulation. He pointed to the book of Revelation for his “conclusive” evidence for the “Pre-Trib.” Rapture, saying that the first three chapters are all about the Church, the fourth is about the Rapture (funny, I can’t see the Rapture of the Church there), then, said the “expert”:

“…the Church is never mentioned again in the whole book”.

Hmm. He must have a different version of the Bible, because mine says this in chapter 22 of Revelation:

“I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches…” (Revelation 22:16).

The entire book of Revelation, says Jesus, is a “testimony for the churches.”

I’ve written in a previous post that “saints” are seen throughout Revelation, with the word having the same meaning as it has throughout the Bible, and that “those who hold to the testimony of Jesus” are seen to be persecuted at a time when, according to our “experts” the Church is supposed to be in heaven.

I have one little bit of advice: test the experts, and don’t blindly trust everything they say.

A WORLD BEING TURNED UPSIDE DOWN

A Lincoln, Nebraska middle school staffer gave teachers training documents advising them not to use “gendered expressions” by calling students “boys and girls” or “ladies and gentlemen,”

Unfortunately, this is a far-from-unique occurrence. You may want to check whether your daughter’s school is allowing boys into the girls’ locker rooms and rest rooms.

http://watchdog.org/174768/gender-inclusive/

WHEN BAD IS REALLY GOOD

Places named “badlands” in the US are, as far as I’m concerned, some of the most beautiful places on earth. I call them “goodlands”.