Evolutionists sound so convincing, so confident, and so knowledgeable, don’t they? But if we listen hard with an open mind, we, the unwashed plebeians who they dictate truth to, can sometimes see the holes in their logic…
In a post I wrote titled “The Must-Haves of Evolution”, I shared the speculation of three learned and credentialed evolutionists, who declared that photosynthesis began billions of years ago when single-celled bacteria were “captured” by large inorganic molecules, and then conscripted as energy-producing slaves.
However, asked by the fawning program host if they could give an idea of “when, within, say, seven hundred million years or so”, said evolution from bacteria into the necessary chloroplast organelles happened, one of the experts answered:
“…there are no fossils of this kind of thing-to date-in rocks, but it must have happened…”
In short, there is no evidence that chloroplasts evolved at all, but in their view, it “must have happened” for plants to evolve (1). Frankly, they’re saying “Believe what we’re telling you, even though we don’t have any evidence”.
Richard Dawkins in Ben Stein’s movie, “Expelled”, when asked how life formed, answered:
“Nobody knows how it started…we know the sort of event that must have happened for the origin of life”.
And half a minute later, Stein asked:
“Right. And how did that happen?”
Prof. Dawkins: “I’ve told you, we don’t know”
Stein: “So you have no idea how it started?”
Dawkins: “No, no, nor has anybody.”
So why are they telling us that it happened?
This week I was listening to a radio documentary about plasma, presented by the host and three scientists (2). My fascination reached its climax on the matter of the earth’s magnetic field and the ionosphere. These are both vital to life on earth because they protect us from the otherwise destructive onslaught of radiation from the sun. I was amazed when the host of the discussion, perhaps without thinking, asked one “why” these features are there. The scientist was silent for a time and seemingly stuck for an answer. In fact, she avoided the question completely.
Scientists either claim to be neutral on the subject of origins or they are blatantly biased for evolution, while still claiming rational neutrality. No doubt the panel had their knowledge of and theories on “how” the earth is protected from the sun, but are not prepared to answer the question of “why”.
Richard Dawkins had said that we have “no right” to ask why we are here: it’s a silly question (3). To those of us who are prepared to ask, and to think with open minds and hearts, the answer is blatantly obvious.
NOTES
1 “IN OUR TIME-PHOTOSYNTHESIS”, BBC, hosted by Melvyn Bragg.
2 “IN OUR TIME-PLASMA”, BBC, hosted by Melvyn Bragg.
3 https://nickyfisher.com/2015/05/30/why-are-we-here-a-silly-question/
RELATED ARTICLES:
https://www.icr.org/article/earths-young-magnetic-field-revisited
https://answersingenesis.org/astronomy/earth/the-earths-magnetic-field-and-the-age-of-the-earth/
Fuel for Faith 