Is your hamburger destroying the earth? Does your car offend Gaia? Should we all stop eating, and shiver through the winter, to save the earth?
This article isn’t intended to be scientific, it’s an expression of my own observations. However, if you want to be scientific in a critique of the current obsession with climate change, you can (1).
YOU ARE BEING HERDED
The agenda to change the world is now almost in full swing, and unfortunately, a large portion of the population, more concerned with their daily lives and what’s on the menu today, are like the Proles in Orwell’s 1984: just prepared to let those in power dictate what they can and cannot do without question. It depresses a man such as myself, who grew up in the 1960s and 1970s, when young people would question authority, teachers and professors and the media, to now see many in our time comply easily: to adopt and embrace the narrative of the establishment, and to believe every word they’re told.
Just a few decades ago we were being warned that global warming was going to make the earth unlivable by now. We were all going to fry, and the ocean was going to destroy low-lying beaches and towns. Not many noticed that wealthy people who shared the rhetoric, such as Barak Obama, were buying beach-front property.
And by the way, I’m all for minimizing the use of plastics.
The term “global warming” didn’t ring true for most people. Winter remained cold and wet, and summer has always been warm or hot, as attested to by anyone who has lived long enough. So the scare-all term was changed to “climate change”. This one is much more easy to manipulate the masses with, because, yes, last week it was sunny and warm, and now, all of a sudden, it’s cool and windy. I’ve been around long enough (sixty four years) to be able to tell you that in my lifetime it’s always been that way. Bob Hope, a popular comedian in the nineteen fifties and sixties, joked on a visit to the UK (where I’m from) sixty years ago, that “England is the only country where you get all four seasons in one day”. When I was a boy we had hot days, we had cold days, and we had days when hail would suddenly fall and stop our sunbathing. The level of the river in my home town is no higher now than it was sixty years ago. I can tell you that nothing has changed. Or has it?
CLIMATE HAS CHANGED BEFORE
Our distant ancestors, we’re told, had to deal with the last ice-age. In this time, which supposedly ended around fourteen thousand years ago, ice sheets thousands of feet thick buried lands now occupied by the nations of northern Europe, northern Asia and North America. The world was far colder then than it is today, and it took hundreds of years for those ice sheets and glaciers to retreat. There are remains of communities under the sea around Britain, in the Black Sea, and other places, which disappeared underwater long before the Industrial Revolution, and long before you ate a single hamburger. Could it be that the ice-sheets are still in process of retreating? Who caused the ice age? Whose fault was it? What industry was attacking the environment, and who was burning fossil fuels besides a few cavemen attempting to stay alive?
The climate has changed numerous times and in numerous ways throughout earth history, which, according to the secularists, is billions of years long. Any change which might actually be taking place now (I said might) could just be a part of one of those natural changes. However, you are being blamed for each sunny hot day now. You ate too many hamburgers. You drank milk from the cow which farted and released methane into the atmosphere. You had the audacity to want to be warm and well-fed! It’s your fault, says the narrative and the elites working to stop you eating that little chunk of meat you treated yourself to, while their table is lavish and rich. Independent observers have documented how the elites swan around the world in their private jets and limousines, which pump huge amounts of carbon into the atmosphere. These are the people planning how you must change your life. This is the gross hypocrisy of tyrants throughout history.
I’ve reviewed a BBC “In Our Time” radio broadcast on this blog. In the episode titled “The Evolution of Crocodiles” and in other episodes I’ve reviewed, we’re told by expert panels of evolutionists (I don’t believe in macro-evolution) that mass-extinction events have altered the course of evolution and earth history. These occurred long, long before you were a twinkle in your father’s eye-or anyone’s eye. Some of these mass-extinction events involved climate change on a scale that not even Greta Thunberg or Al Gore have imagined, and images depicting these events show conditions no-one on earth witnesses today. Whose fault were they? Did the crocodiles eat too much meat? Did dinosaurs fart too much? Did they drive fossil-fueled cars?
HAMBURGERS AND RESPONSIBILITY
There may well be some small change in the climate occurring: such things are known to have occurred even over the last two thousand years-naturally. I entirely agree with being responsible in the way we farm and dispose of garbage and burn fuel. I’ve always thought that all of our forests should be preserved and promoted, along with many vast open and unspoiled places. I love all of nature and have always wished it to be preserved as much as possible. But preventing you from eating a hamburger or a steak-as some elites and vote hungry politicians are intent on doing-isn’t going to make any real difference. As any committed evolutionist will tell you, life will find a way. Their stories of the past will tell you that plainly, and as a firm believer in God’s creative power and will, I can see that that’s how God has designed life.
It seems to me that the issue of climate change is largely fabricated and definitely exaggerated. It’s now exaggerated by politicians who see it as their opportunity to get the votes they need to give them power and a prosperous income. It’s exaggerated by extremists in the environmental movement who think that humanity is a blight on the earth, and it’s being exaggerated by those wanting to bring down the West and destroy capitalism. And what’s made the whole concept take off is that in our materialistic society, where God has been largely exorcised from public consideration, people are desperate-naturally-to find meaning to life. Saving the planet has provided the perfect opportunity for millions to find that meaning. Each time the well-meaning participant in the whole charade eats a carrot rather than a hamburger, or walks to his destination rather than using a car, he’s getting a little buzz of self-pride, in the knowledge that his life is not insignificant after all: he’s saving the earth from certain disaster. He’s saving it for coming generations. He’s sending a signal to others around him (and this is where mass psychosis comes in) that he is virtuous and entirely woke. And what could be more meaningful than that?
3 thoughts on “WHAT DO I THINK OF CLIMATE CHANGE?”
RE “mass psychosis”…
The official framing of the mass formation (or mass psychosis) “phenomenon” is misleading and wrong in terms of what the whole true reality is. The false hope-addicted psychologists and their acolytes want you to believe this is “just some temporary occasional” madness by the masses when it is but a spike of a CHRONIC madness going on for aeons with “civilized” people — read “The 2 Married Pink Elephants In The Historical Room –The Holocaustal Covid-19 Coronavirus Madness: A Sociological Perspective & Historical Assessment Of The Covid “Phenomenon”” …. https://www.rolf-hefti.com/covid-19-coronavirus.html
One of these mainstream psychologists who have been spreading this whitewashed reality, Dr. Desmet, also fails to see that the PLANNED Covid Psyop is a TOTALLY deliberate ploy because he doesn’t think (after more than 1 year, even 2 years, into this total PLANNED scam!) it’s ALL intentionally sinister as he stated in a prior podcast (this makes him witting or unwitting controlled opposition).
In the May of 2022 podcast with James Corbett he stated that “some people tend to overestimate the degree of planning and intentions” (behind the COUNTLESS, VERIFIABLE, FULLY INTENTIONAL, FULLY PLANNED atrocities by the ruling tribe of psychopaths over the last century alone) and see all of it as being planned which Desmet called “an extreme position” … Sound logical thinking is “extreme” and therefore false and sick in his demented delusional view!!!
In his overpriced misleading whitewashing old material regurgitated book the psychology of totalitarianism he too states that “There are countless … examples that seem to point in the direction of a plan being implemented, such as the fact that the definition of ‘pandemic’ was adjusted shortly before the coronavirus crisis; that the definition of ‘herd immunity’ was changed during the crisis, implying that only vaccines can achieve it … [he continuous with several other obvious facts of an ENTIRELY PLANNED event, especially discerned through the totality of all these facts].” “SEEM to point in the direction of a plan”??? No! They most evidently, clearly, and irrefutably DO demonstrate and prove it IS a COMPLETELY AND FULLY DELIBERATE PlanDemic! A big scam. An Entirely Planned Holocaust against the non-ruling herd of people (see cited link above). A coherent 12-year old kid can figure that out.
It clearly shows Desmet’s own complete lunacy. But because almost everyone in the culture is a member of mass formation (madness), including the “woke” people of the alternative media domain, hardly anyone recognizes Desmet’s lunacy. Not surprising that he has even become some type of popular “guru” among the adherents of the alternative media landscape and his whitewashed fake narrative strongly resonates with both mainstream people and alternative mainstream folks.
With his false use of language Desmet obscures or hides the true reality instead of directly and uncompromising exposing it — aiding the obfuscation of the vital reality of what the ruling authorities really are. He does the same thing when he speaks of ‘the elite’ (as he does in a number of podcasts) when, in reality, they are THE SCUM OF HUMANS because they are REALITY-VERIFIED PSYCHOPATHS (see referenced source above). Yet in the Corbett podcast he “teaches” us that we, the masses, need to start thinking differently. Right… how about YOU start with sane instead of insane thinking/talking/”teaching”/etc, Dr. Desmet?
How do self-styled “truth-tellers” wake up the masses to the so-called truth when they THEMSELVES use lies with their deceitful fake language???
No one is “teaching” or “waking up” the ignorant masses to the CORE truths with lies, with the official “language of lies” (see cited source above).
This all means Desmet is ALSO a member of the masses of lunatics, an ACTIVE CARD-CARRYING MEMBER of mass formation!!! When, if at all, will he wake up from his state of mass psychosis, his “invisible” stupidity? When, if at all, will he face the TRUE and FULL reality instead of hiding behind fantasies such as his whitewashed “reality” of human civilization?
It shows we live in a global mental asylum with criminal and/or delusional mainstream psychologists, scientists, and docs as the guards, “teachers” and “therapists” … The blind/criminal/mad leading the blind/criminal/mad; the blind/criminal/mad adhere to the blind/criminal/mad = the human madhouse.
Worst of all, perhaps, the mass formation/mass psychosis notion frames the problem as the public being a mere unaccountable non-culpable victim in this phenomenon (the gist of the circular argument is: the masses should change their thinking but they got brainwashed so they’re victims). Nothing could be further from the truth (see referenced source above).
Desmet is right in that truth-activists must fight against mass formation psychosis (human madness). That also means exposing HIS deeply destructive mad part of it. This comment serves, in part, that objective.
If you are in the United States and your employer has mandated the toxic/lethal COVID jabs, you can register to receive a “Medical Exemption Certificate” for free at https://drgastonmedicalexemption.com or https://lc.org/exempt
Thank you for that. I’ve no doubt there’s some truth to it, and as it says, it involves psychologists, scientists, and docs, but also professors and so on. Nobody wants to oppose the popular views, and nobody wants to lose their job or fail to get their degree, and on it goes.
It is a good question to ask from anyone. Thank you 🌍
LikeLiked by 1 person